Feeling Like Baby Is Pressing Against Cervix 34 Weeks

You know about how individuals gain command of the power of the Country and then abuse that power like former US President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a state of war in Republic of iraq which was highly profitable for some The states businesses.  He accomplished this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious earth security threat when Iraq did not and when information technology had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush United kingdom The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley 15 Feb 2011.

Remember how Bush was supported by Britain Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the U.s.a. with faked "intelligence" of Republic of iraq's weapons of mass destruction which did non be but which Blair claimed could be deployed within forty minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you remember that and so y'all volition know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Find how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can save the states all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  Information technology had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this twenty-four hours.

On CHS we wrote previously virtually how unscientific the merits is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the illness came about as a result of the interaction of three completely dissimilar factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, peculiarly nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – whatsoever vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself non to have:

Minor Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease chosen smallpox and information technology did kill people long ago.

This was especially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for convenance and spreading disease: London's starting time park congenital after rich feared disease spread from slums UK The Contained Past Andy McSmith Fri 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized Globe.

The middle and upper classes needed to be reassured the State would keep them safe from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed as many or more the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, United kingdom, Usa, Sweden.

Now you can read a relatively brusque but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its function in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Physician – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Bloodshed- United kingdom, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  Past 1901 in the United kingdom, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the illness dimished with improved living standards and was non vanquished past vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see table beneath].  Leicester's approach also toll far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" Past J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Volume equally .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Table 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Menstruum.	Minor-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (United kingdom)	1860-1908	1,355	96	7.1
British Ground forces (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.1
British Ground forces (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	viii.8
Royal Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	8.0
Grand Totals and instance fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	v.1

Biggs said "In this comparing, I take given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist linguistic communication, may I ask, if the excessive pocket-size-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Purple Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? Information technology would beget an interesting psychical study were nosotros able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would take soared with a corresponding result—but on the contrary side."

Table 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Toll, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Pocket-sized-Pox Cases	Pocket-sized-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	16.fifty	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	xi.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	ix.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.x	£one,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Physician

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching flu season and the enthusiastic calls to use the flu vaccine, you might exist wondering where the thought of vaccination got its start. Where did the thought of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books nowadays a elementary tale of the origin of vaccination. Most present the same basic tale of the brilliant ascertainment of a unproblematic country doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a mortiferous and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or as it was oft chosen the speckled monster. In a recent and popular volume, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year one-time boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes'south cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps'southward hands. The boy came downwards with a slight fever, only nil more. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, albeit mild, case of the disease. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once more; again, nothing. [1]

Edward Jenner'due south idea eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to every bit cowpoxing, only eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in identify, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly serpent-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner fable has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the mortiferous enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

Merely legendary heroes, especially those that are used to support a belief, achieve an iconic status while whatsoever unsavory aspects most the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of salubrious people. This idea was introduced to the Western world past Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practice of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a affair of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The idea backside inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do ameliorate against the illness than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable time and place in the future.

The idea was embraced past the medical profession and enthusiastically expert. But because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could only be afforded by the wealthy.[three] The procedure did oft help protect the individual that was inoculated, but there was all the same an estimated ii-5% that died as a result.[four,5] Still, this was an improvement compared to a twenty-25% bloodshed rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[half-dozen] Only, was the difference in bloodshed due to inoculation alone? Or could it accept had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the majority of social club?

At that place was i major and more often than not unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would have been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the do of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years earlier the introduction of variolation to the 38 years afterwards, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, considering it caused more than deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contamination, tends to increase that danger; the practise of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would not otherwise have been produced; the identify where it is thus produced becomes a centre of contamination, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the affliction should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are obviously multiplied very greatly past Inoculation . . .[7]

All the same, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of information technology spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had go a very lucrative process it was enthusiastically continued by most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread past this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. Information technology was rumored amid milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect 1 from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-year-former boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the kid to smallpox every bit a test to see if he was protected past the cowpox inoculation. When the male child did not contract clinical smallpox, it was causeless that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the utilize of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the fourth dimension who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a coming together of the Medico-Convivial Guild, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the beginning there were problems with Jenner'south procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report but decided to ignore the results because they were not in support of his theory.[nine]

Vaccination was quickly embraced by many in the medical profession as the answer to combating smallpox. Past 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to embrace Jenner's ideas amid numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early on reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were notwithstanding dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the year 1799. A month afterwards information technology was inoculated with small-pox matter without upshot, and a few months afterward took confluent small-pox and died. 2. A woman-servant to Mr. Gamble, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the coincidental way from milking. Seven years subsequently she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught minor-pox, and died. iii and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, iii years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The child of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's office . . . died of minor-pox a yr after vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early on 1800s began to accrue showing vaccination was not living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox afterwards vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality rate as smallpox earlier vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Some other article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering nether Pocket-size Pox, who have previously undergone Vaccination past the about skillful practitioners, is at nowadays alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Dark-brown, a surgeon with 30 years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine do." Just after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, after vaccination, people nonetheless could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practice.[13]

Similar today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a trend to encompass information technology as a new form of income. It is therefore quite significant for a doctor to have spoken out against it every bit Dr. Chocolate-brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could however infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could too be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, ii [1820-1822] there was a great hubbub most the pocket-sized-pox. Information technology broke out with the neat epidemic to the northward . . . It pressed close to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-pox before, and often severely; almost to expiry; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, but vicious upon slap-up numbers.[fourteen]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote virtually the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, take taken the real small-pox after, and take either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine cloth was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but every bit failures increased in that location was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed dominance, and there were calls to obtain fresh cloth directly from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the cloth originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was but smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new illness.[18] This faulty conventionalities would result in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a moo-cow's udder. He and so took pus from that cow and used information technology to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A later inquiry determined that this was nothing more than the old practise of smallpox inoculation.[xx]

Not only was vaccination declining and causing smallpox epidemics, but there were too reports of deaths from other causes before long after vaccination. For example, a skin status called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful way to dice.

. . . a male child from Somers-town, anile five years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of iv months; 1 cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, anile 22 years, "pocket-size-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two skillful cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, anile x weeks, and the son of a sugar baker, anile 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the encephalon."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was beingness used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke earlier the Academy at Paris.

First I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. Simply facts accumulated more than and more, and at present I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I practise this very reluctantly. At nowadays I do not hesitate longer to admit and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more than doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what information technology was promised to exist, refusals increased. In gild to deal with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did zero to adjourn the trouble of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, at that place were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the not bad 1872 epidemic. Subsequently 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the nigh severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph one). In fact, more than people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the xx years earlier.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality charge per unit from 1841 to 1880.

Past this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less probable to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were so made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, at that place were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were beingness fabricated past vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the strength of law created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western globe.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the nowadays twelvemonth they volition become nearly a quarter meg. Other sums, also, which I cannot proper noun, accept been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced then much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French regular army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian state of war there were twenty-iii thousand four hundred and sixty-9 cases of pocket-size-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine one thousand three hundred and ninety-2 small-pox patients in London hospitals, half-dozen thousand eight hundred and fifty-iv had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole land more than than ane hundred and 20-two thousand vaccinated persons have suffered from pocket-sized-pox . . . Official returns from Germany show that between 1870 and 1885 one 1000000 vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the bully demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same twelvemonth Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective ways that eliminated the need for vaccination. However, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination rate would outcome in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the bulk of the town's residents were steadfast in their conventionalities that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Depression vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a great manufacturing boondocks having a population of nearly a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial test of an experience extending over a period of more than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less affected by that illness since information technology abandoned vaccination than it was at a fourth dimension when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was oftentimes promoted equally a prophylactic procedure, it often caused sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales full deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph iv: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox inverse its character. After the summertime of 1897, the astringent type of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United states. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed i in five of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from 1 in 50 and later to as low as one in 380. The disease could yet kill, but having get so much milder, it was oft mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and subsequently gradually spread over the country. The bloodshed was very low and information technology [smallpox] was usually at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Periodical of Infectious Diseases presented a tabular array showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox decease charge per unit was effectually 20%, as it had been historically. The tabular array likewise showed that after 1896 the death charge per unit fell off speedily, starting with 6% in 1897 to as depression as 0.26% by 1908. As the mild grade of smallpox replaced the archetype blazon, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a mild disease of babyhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a minor communicable illness of childhood, and is chiefly important because it frequently gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very hard to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced piddling in the style of symptoms, fifty-fifty though few had been vaccinated.

Private cases, or fifty-fifty epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection by vaccination, the grade of the disease is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms balmy or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely depression vaccine coverage rate, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Fifty-fifty though smallpox was not a major issue, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the terminal smallpox decease in the United States in 1948 upwardly until 1963. This resulted in an estimated v,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 report detailed the cases of ix children in which ii died of a skin status due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to exist between 1 in twenty,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of four to 40%.[35] However, they acknowledged that nearly cases were not reported and at that place was no authentic bookkeeping on this consequence of vaccination. There were besides an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time there had only been 1 smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox death in the United states of america following an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time there have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected past his military begetter after the father was vaccinated. Subsequently a prolonged admission, and a calendar week of experimental treatments including allowed globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother also required treatment and virus was found all over the house.[38]

Considering of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 written report thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been even college. This written report merely examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United States. If the deaths were this high in a land with a modernistic wellness-care system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present beyond the entire world?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and perhaps afraid that if we did the accident of some hereafter epidemic might put us in the wrong. We adopt to let compulsory vaccination dice a natural death and are relieved that the general public is non curious enough to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as nigh the only medically promoted way to bargain with disease, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common food product that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 commodity described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. Yard. Oliphant, Grand.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the use of Acetic acrid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" every bit applied to small pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable as a safe in modest-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the ill and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, later on breakfast and at evening, for xiv days. Few persons thus treated took the affliction at all. None who adopted the condom treatment died, while among those nether ordinary treatment the mortality was every bit usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the affliction. The writer notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple tree cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used three or four times a twenty-four hours to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past take been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the existent preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need have no fear of smallpox if he will take two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar 3 or four times a day." The discussion may now be regarded as closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem light-headed, but only considering most people have been conditioned to accept the age-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, illness-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected beast'south (usually a moo-cow) abdomen, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or but an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of salubrious collagen. Collagen is the poly peptide that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and as well gives back up to internal organs. In scurvy, the torso is non able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar property cells together and, as a result, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King's Higher, described the poor nutrition of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and alcohol while working long, hard days nether the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fatty, which completely saturates information technology. This is washed down with copious librations of strong coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the most intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Blitz of the mid-1800s, an estimated ten,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Ceremonious War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For example, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy straight accounted for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next mutual cause of expiry, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for simply a pocket-size fraction. Those who were killed in actual boxing or who died as a result of their wounds accounted only for 1 percent of the total deaths.

Other big infectious killers such every bit crimson fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (besides known every bit pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild babyhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & 6).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough bloodshed rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph vi: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a state doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to be echoed past indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine organized religion. But the truthful history shows the states a different reality.

The brand proper noun of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche as something to protect someone from an illness. This conventionalities spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of affliction matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is nothing close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, diet, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and take since vanished from societal commonage memory. Instead nosotros were left with the mythical history of Jenner'due south great discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular affair from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more than and more vaccines seem like a good idea to you?

More than information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies tin be found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk'southward book "Dissolving Illusions" which can be constitute on amazon.com

Bibliography:
ane.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.5. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present Land of the British Settlements of Due north-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
vi.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Printing, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Admirer's Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
eight.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, Doctor, A Century of Vaccination and What information technology Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. Viii, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brownish, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Book Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
fourteen."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Immature Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in French republic," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and periodical of applied medicine, vol. twenty, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. iv, 1834, p. 796.
xix.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Report on the Product of Vaccine Virus in the United states," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
twenty.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Written report of Legislation Regarding Public Wellness in the Land of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. iv, February 1909, p. fifty-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. half dozen, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. xix, no. iv, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.Yard. W. Harman, MD, "A Physician's Statement Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Confronting Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, Dr., "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Illness," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. fifteen.
31.J. Due west. Hodge, Physician, "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. III, no. 16, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious Illness as Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. thirteen, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume i, Westward.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Physician and Howard A. Joos Physician, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale periodical of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. x.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, January ane, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acetic Acrid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Periodical of Medicine, vol. VI, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, Jan four to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Do good to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), Nov 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Harm, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safe, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, regime, Wellness, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Impairment, Vaccines |

santanathentlas.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post